Entry tags:
Book 6 - Carlo Rovelli "Helgoland"
Carlo Rovelli "Helgoland" (Penguin)

The first two parts of this book provide an account of the origins of quantum theory and canvas a number of interpretations of how best to make sense of the curious world that appears to arise in light of this theory. These are challenging sections to read, even though the real math is shunted off to endnotes. Fortunately Rovelli is never less than exceptionally clear and even though the math is certainly beyond me, the argument was comprehensible and persuasive. Ultimately Rovelli defends a relational account of quantum mechanics that sensibly avoids the kinds of hostages to metaphysical fortune that burden the other major competing accounts.
The third part of the book then moves away from the difficult but well-trodden ground (at least for Rovelli) of quantum theory into areas less certain and less satisfactory. I appreciate that Rovelli is remarkably well-read but I worry that outside the confines of physics he does not bring an equal scrutiny to bear on statements that might superficially appear to lend tangential support to his relational account. That is unfortunate because it suggests that he doesn’t think these disciplines can sustain equal critical weight. Or is he simply having too much fun in these regions outside his safe (but mathematically rigorous) realm? In any case, I fear it leads to a much weaker book than might otherwise have been the case.
Nevertheless, I’m happy to recommend this book on the strength of those first two parts and shall continue to look forward to Rovelli’s further explications of physics.

The first two parts of this book provide an account of the origins of quantum theory and canvas a number of interpretations of how best to make sense of the curious world that appears to arise in light of this theory. These are challenging sections to read, even though the real math is shunted off to endnotes. Fortunately Rovelli is never less than exceptionally clear and even though the math is certainly beyond me, the argument was comprehensible and persuasive. Ultimately Rovelli defends a relational account of quantum mechanics that sensibly avoids the kinds of hostages to metaphysical fortune that burden the other major competing accounts.
The third part of the book then moves away from the difficult but well-trodden ground (at least for Rovelli) of quantum theory into areas less certain and less satisfactory. I appreciate that Rovelli is remarkably well-read but I worry that outside the confines of physics he does not bring an equal scrutiny to bear on statements that might superficially appear to lend tangential support to his relational account. That is unfortunate because it suggests that he doesn’t think these disciplines can sustain equal critical weight. Or is he simply having too much fun in these regions outside his safe (but mathematically rigorous) realm? In any case, I fear it leads to a much weaker book than might otherwise have been the case.
Nevertheless, I’m happy to recommend this book on the strength of those first two parts and shall continue to look forward to Rovelli’s further explications of physics.