John Tulloch "Dr.Who, The Unfolding Text" (Macmillan)

I guess this was the first book on Who from an academic point of view (published 1983). Better such books have been published since but this is a decent enough start - easy to mock for its slips ("Mandragola", "Castravalva" and variations, "Doug Adams") and for its rather partial selection of stories from the black and white era, and for its occasional repetitiveness, but I found a number of really interesting points too: despite the authors' somewhat uncritical acceptance of Ian Levine's views.
Graham Williams is allowed to put his side of the story and puts it well, and one gets a sense as in nowhere else that I have seen of Who as emerging from continual dialogue among its creators.
Also they actually explain the phrase "semiotic thickness" and make it comprehensible. despite such caveats, if you are a fan of the series (Like myself) you should try and get hold of this.

I guess this was the first book on Who from an academic point of view (published 1983). Better such books have been published since but this is a decent enough start - easy to mock for its slips ("Mandragola", "Castravalva" and variations, "Doug Adams") and for its rather partial selection of stories from the black and white era, and for its occasional repetitiveness, but I found a number of really interesting points too: despite the authors' somewhat uncritical acceptance of Ian Levine's views.
Graham Williams is allowed to put his side of the story and puts it well, and one gets a sense as in nowhere else that I have seen of Who as emerging from continual dialogue among its creators.
Also they actually explain the phrase "semiotic thickness" and make it comprehensible. despite such caveats, if you are a fan of the series (Like myself) you should try and get hold of this.