![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Robert Lane Greene "You Are What You Speak : Grammar Grouches, Language Laws, and the Politics of Identity (Delacorte Press)

The subtitle of this book is: “Grammar Grouches, Language Laws, and the Politics of Identity.” That is actually a pretty good summary of this book, which is a series of essays emphasizing linguists’ (including the author) views of language and some of the issues surrounding it.
I once heard a lecturer at university summer school many years ago (during my Open University days) when i say that the best kind of learning is learning about one’s self. If that’s true, You Are What You Speak provides the best kind of learning. An example: In my reviews, I can be quick to criticize professional writers who make silly mistakes in print when they should know better. I cringe every time I see “who” used when “whom” is correct (but seeing such mistakes doesn’t ruin my day). Reading Robert Lane Greene’s book has liberated me from being overly concerned about grammar. Even if the distinction between who and whom goes away, that’s just the way language has always evolved. Unless we want English to become a dead language, it will change and the world will go on spinning and orbiting around the sun. So, I’m going to lighten up and find something else to worry about.
I love the author’s writing style, his informed view of the politics of language, and all that he gives readers to think about. I got much more from You Are What You Speak than I could have expected or even imagined.
I also like that the author takes on some very popular writers on language including Lynne Truss (of Eats, Shoots & Leaves fame) in the chapter “A Brief History of Sticklers,” and Bill Bryson (who wrote The Mother Tongue) in the chapter “Babel and the Damage Done.” And he chides the English teachers who preached about not splitting infinitives or ending a sentence with a preposition as if those were really rules of English grammar. Shame on them!

The subtitle of this book is: “Grammar Grouches, Language Laws, and the Politics of Identity.” That is actually a pretty good summary of this book, which is a series of essays emphasizing linguists’ (including the author) views of language and some of the issues surrounding it.
I once heard a lecturer at university summer school many years ago (during my Open University days) when i say that the best kind of learning is learning about one’s self. If that’s true, You Are What You Speak provides the best kind of learning. An example: In my reviews, I can be quick to criticize professional writers who make silly mistakes in print when they should know better. I cringe every time I see “who” used when “whom” is correct (but seeing such mistakes doesn’t ruin my day). Reading Robert Lane Greene’s book has liberated me from being overly concerned about grammar. Even if the distinction between who and whom goes away, that’s just the way language has always evolved. Unless we want English to become a dead language, it will change and the world will go on spinning and orbiting around the sun. So, I’m going to lighten up and find something else to worry about.
I love the author’s writing style, his informed view of the politics of language, and all that he gives readers to think about. I got much more from You Are What You Speak than I could have expected or even imagined.
I also like that the author takes on some very popular writers on language including Lynne Truss (of Eats, Shoots & Leaves fame) in the chapter “A Brief History of Sticklers,” and Bill Bryson (who wrote The Mother Tongue) in the chapter “Babel and the Damage Done.” And he chides the English teachers who preached about not splitting infinitives or ending a sentence with a preposition as if those were really rules of English grammar. Shame on them!
no subject
Date: 2016-03-05 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-05 02:53 pm (UTC)Here's one for you... when writing fiction, what do you do if you know your character would be more likely to use the incorrect word (thinking particularly of who/whom, but there are others)? At least on this side of the pond, people are less likely to say "whom" while speaking than they would writing, and I can't put "whom" in my barely-educated laborer's mouth, it just wouldn't happen.
no subject
Date: 2016-03-05 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-05 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-05 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-05 02:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-05 03:29 pm (UTC)And most slang words or sentences don't bother me either but I HATE when people say "My bad." I want to reach up and slappity slap slap them. I don't know why it bothers me so much but it does.
I never knew that the spelling for "Allot" had two L's until I read a blog where the writer stated that every time she sees it with 1 L she mentally see's a monster she created in her head called the "A lot". lol. Ever since then I have spelled it with 2.
no subject
Date: 2016-03-05 03:46 pm (UTC)LOL........................
Hugs, Jon
no subject
Date: 2016-03-05 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-06 01:02 am (UTC);'
Date: 2016-03-06 07:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-03-07 11:51 am (UTC)