jazzy_dave: (Default)
[personal profile] jazzy_dave
I have been watching episodes of The Librarians on the Syfy channel. I really do not know what to think of it and in some ways reminds me of Waehouse 13, although i did enjoy the Boston episode with the labyrinth and the Minotaur.

I also like the idea of a representative door to anywhere from the library to anywhere else, and hence an Einstein Rosen bridge , or in more familiar terms, a wormhole,that allows instantaneous travel between points.

As yet researchers have no observational evidence for wormholes, but the equations of the theory of general relativity have valid solutions that contain wormholes. Because of its robust theoretical strength, a wormhole is one of the great physics metaphors for teaching general relativity (see formula below). The first type of wormhole solution discovered was the Schwarzschild wormhole, which would be present in the Schwarzschild metric describing an eternal black hole, but it was found that it would collapse too quickly for anything to cross from one end to the other. Wormholes that could be crossed in both directions, known as traversable wormholes, would only be possible if exotic matter with negative energy density could be used to stabilize them.

An affect called the Casimir effect shows that quantum field theory allows the energy density in certain regions of space to be negative relative to the ordinary vacuum energy, and it has been shown theoretically that quantum field theory allows states where energy can be arbitrarily negative at a given point.

It has been hypothesized that such effects might make it possible to stabilize a traversable wormhole. Physicists have not found any natural process that would be predicted to form a wormhole naturally in the context of general relativity, although the quantum foam hypothesis is sometimes used to suggest that tiny wormholes might appear and disappear spontaneously at the Planck scale, and stable versions of such wormholes have been suggested as dark matter candidates. It has also been proposed that, if a tiny wormhole held open by a negative-mass cosmic string had appeared around the time of the Big Bang, it could have been inflated to macroscopic size by cosmic inflation.

The American theoretical physicist John Archibald Wheeler coined the term wormhole in 1957; the German mathematician Hermann Weyl, however, had proposed the wormhole theory in 1921, in connection with mass analysis of electromagnetic field energy.


G_{\mu \nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu \nu}= {8\pi G\over c^4} T_{\mu \nu}



I digress, going back to this fantasy series,it is too wayward as yet for me to like it. In general , i find it silly, and despite the fact that Warehouse 13 had silly moments, it had darker tones. For the time being i shall sit on the fence before committing to the series one way or another.

I see that there is another Spielberg related series coming to the small screen called Extant, which with Halle Berry in it, looks promising.

Date: 2015-01-03 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilchiva.livejournal.com
"Extant, which with Halle Berry in it, looks promising'

But, it's actually awful. That's too bad, as it has so many things going for it. For example, Pierce Gagnon has got to be the creepiest child actor of all time.


I don't think the Librarians are going to move from its current sweet spot, in terms of tone. Shows like this tend to get goofier rather than darker. But, maybe they will surprise us there. But, regardless of the super cheese, my family likes watching it.

Date: 2015-01-03 11:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davesmusictank.livejournal.com
Well, i am prepared to give it a bit of a go since it has Matt Frewer in it.
Edited Date: 2015-01-03 11:51 pm (UTC)

Date: 2015-01-04 12:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilchiva.livejournal.com
Watching Max Headroom do a Jeremy Irons impersonation is really quite worthwhile.

Date: 2015-01-03 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ravenfeather.livejournal.com
So far I have liked the premier episode best, with other characters to distract from the silly librarians. The minotaur one I could sit through, but I had to turn santa clause off. I am fairly sure I won't watch it again. It looked good, but the writing is terrible IMO.

Date: 2015-01-03 07:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martianmooncrab.livejournal.com
its filmed right here in Portland Oregon, and the main entrance is the underside of the St Johns Bridge. So, now we have this, Grimm and Portlandia filming here.

Date: 2015-01-03 08:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nutmeg3.livejournal.com
I didn't see the lead-up movies to The Librarians, but I'm enjoying the show. And I kind of liked Extant, even though it wasn't really all that good, but I suspect S1 is all we're getting.

Date: 2015-01-04 12:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davesmusictank.livejournal.com
Extant is being aired here on Jan 20th.

Date: 2015-01-03 10:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coming42.livejournal.com
I am trying to get my head around wormholes and time travel as expounded in Stephen Hawking's book A Brief History of Time. And this was published in 1988 and I am still having trouble understanding his uncertainty principle and definition of black holes. Something to talk about tomorrow, bro!

Date: 2015-01-03 11:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davesmusictank.livejournal.com
It is not his, it is Heisenberg's. It is very counter intuitive, and not easy to put in terms that makes sense. Put simply , if you are measuring momentum or position than you have influence as the observer on which of these two values will be most accurate. You cannot have both. The observer influences the outcome and you end up with a probability curve similar to a bell curve in which there are probabilities of either position or momentum.
Edited Date: 2015-01-03 11:40 pm (UTC)

Date: 2015-01-03 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davesmusictank.livejournal.com
here is another way of thinking about the Uncertainty Principle.
Imagine that you're blind and over time you've developed a technique for determining how far away an object is by throwing a medicine ball at it. If you throw your medicine ball at a nearby stool, the ball will return quickly, and you'll know that it's close. If you throw the ball at something across the street from you, it'll take longer to return, and you'll know that the object is far away.
The problem i­s that when you throw a ball -- especially a heavy one like a medicine ball -- at something like a stool, the ball will knock the stool across the room and may even have enough momentum to bounce back. You can say where the stool was, but not where it is now. What's more, you could calculate the velocity of the stool after you hit it with the ball, but you have no idea what its velocity was before you hit it.
This is the problem revealed by Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.

To know the velocity of a quark we must measure it, and to measure it, we are forced to affect it. The same goes for observing an object's position. Uncertainty about an object's position and velocity makes it difficult for a physicist to determine much about the object.
Of course, physicists aren't exactly throwing medicine balls at quanta to measure them, but even the slightest interference can cause the incredibly small particles to behave differently.

Date: 2015-01-03 11:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] coming42.livejournal.com
I understand that the uncertainty principle was Heisenberg's - Hawking refers to it in his book. His (Heisenberg's) uncertainty principle is a fundamental, inescapable property. This brings us on to Planck's constant. More to discuss tomorrow...!

!!

Date: 2015-01-04 12:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pigshitpoet.livejournal.com
those would make great sound speakers!

Profile

jazzy_dave: (Default)
jazzy_dave

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
151617181920 21
222324 25262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 29th, 2026 03:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios