I keep hearing that the Democrats do not have a deep bench, as in who is going to lead the party. Clinton, Biden, Sanders are too old. And I think it is overblown a bit. but Elizabeth Warren is exactly the name I was thinking. With luck.
You watch—Cory Booker's coming up, too. And he's young: younger than Warren, and maybe also than Duckworth (who is not that old). I just hope we'll still have elections in 4 years.
On a more obscure note, I really want to see John Fetterman go places.
btw, google ceo is guilty of election fraud in redirecting content for hillary against trump. that doesn't mean to say the republicans are not evil (i mean guilty) as well.. as they helped to invent the game of polarization of nation to destabilize and control governments for profit from taxation.
all i can say as a sovereign citizen and taxpayer is i want my money back. nothing personal.
What about Governor-General and appoint there a newborn princess Charlotte of Cambridge. May be UK will decide to reestablish a colony there after all.
The only hope I have is that their base is shrinking. America is getting browner and queerer, women are getting more educated, and his SCWM base hates every minute of it, but they're also not popping out enough kids to counter it.
I really have my doubts about us ever having a female president. Certainly not in my lifetime.
I love Michelle Obama, but I think the double handicap of being female and a person of color would be too much to overcome in the next, say, 50 years. We've seen the obstruction her husband has faced because of his skin color. I'd vote for her in a heartbeat, though!
Will we ever have a female president? Some day, maybe. I didn't think we would ever have a Black president, but we did. I doubt it will happen again for many years, but we did.
I really don't think Michelle will run. Maybe I should say I hope she doesn't. I love Michelle, but enough of the family ties. The same with Chelsea. If they are smart, they will stay away from the White House. Hugs, Jon
depends on the weather channel, if it's haarp, it's glowing uranium, if it's a flight out of egypt, that's blue, if it's conspiracy monday, it's vanilla, and then there is that psychedelic rainbow palette for easter bunnies and new age yoginis... ok today, it's blue! with intermittent clouds..
i love alex, since he is not afraid to wear his heart on his sleeve unlike the illuminati who consistently murder to cover up their tracks)))
Quote: “I really think — her daughters don’t look like her — I really think this is some weird hoax they did again,” he said, “just like he didn’t get sworn in on the Bible, it was the Quran. All this weirdness, I mean, I used to laugh at this stuff, but man, it’s all about rubbing our noses in it. I think it’s all an arranged marriage, it’s all completely fake and it’s this big sick joke because he’s obsessed with transgender, just like some weird cult or something. I think Michelle Obama is a man. I really do. I really do. I believe it.” - AJ
sorry, since you asked, i will explain,really, it's far from personal -- there are darker things horatio in earth and heaven than dreamed of in our philosophies.. - locker room talk, yes, poor taste like trump talk in a guy's world. i believe it is a tactic men use to shake loose complacency in ourselves and others. there is a great truth telling going on in the world today, after losing trust in our governments and being manipulated by ruling elite, who are just as stuck being the ruling elite, to the point of doubting ourselves, we simply want to strike out at anything that relates to the deception. obama never did a thing he promised. in fact he did the exact opposite and lies about it, at what expense? war with russia? christ. the same is true in europe where the ruling elite are playing both ends against the middle for fun and profit, brevet, the eu. three words, -rothschild world banks. our last election in canada voted out harper and the standing elite thank god. the same just happened in america. people are fed up with lies and fascist injustice. as a salvage wreck of a human being, i am left with anger, frustration, disbelief and rebellion against everything. that is what we do when we are driven to the point of denial we are in today. i am not making excuses, you are right, it is a crude remark. but i somehow have to process these things, cryptic as they may be, calling out for help. maybe someone else is conscious enough to also talk about it. so when someone asks, i'm torn between whether to hold back or just blurt out my true feelings. my filter is in question, doesn't work any longer, no catholic, no humanitarian, no common sense, no good feelings exist within us as we struggle with the big lie. do we comply or shout hell no, we won't go! so i have chosen to fight everything. if it is worthy, it will prove itself, as you have challenged me here. otherwise, we might just as well all lie down and die, for all we are worth. and let the cabal continue it's little ceremonies of deceiving us and sacrificing children and murdering for power and starting wars. the truth is that hillary is guilty of that very thing called pedophilia, gender bending and treason, so a t-shirt claiming to protect the feminine isn't even close to the need for protection i feel as being chivalrous towards women. i'm pretty sick of the masquerade by our world elites. so, let me ask you, about this cartoon - in terms of reverse feminism, is it a joke or a concept? i don't see livejournal as a place to come for the light hearted. hillary says this and then perpetrates virgin sacrifices against underaged girls. how is that not game for criticism? she uses women like a shield for her personal gain, like the zionists use the jews to mop up their blame. it has to end somewhere, but my silence can't be bought. sorry. if you doubt any of this, wikileaks has the straight goods on this. proof. the rest is just smoke and mirrors to make us look the other way and feel better about ourselves. again, sorry if that offended you. love.
Hey, I get you that you're pissed about things. I don't think you're entirely well informed about some of those things, but I get that you're pissed. But trans people (among others) are going to have a reeeaaaal rough time of it right now, and with that in mind, it would be cool of you to at least not use slurs (not trans and can't claim to speak for them, but the word tranny, especially in a pejorative sense, is definitely a slur).
i sad it's not personal, but where it has affected me personally and cause me to become disenfranchised it has become personal. i am looking for healing and people who would like to discuss things openly regardless of position, because i think the world needs to step up to that or we're hooped. we might as well join the animals into extinction or the radical fundamentalist into jihad.
i'm just saying to myself, i told you so, and i did see all this ten years ago. it just took a while for it to come into mainstream media and we have wikileaks and anonymous to thank for that. for instance, what do you make of this?
so i just call a spade a spade and if someone has had a sex change we just silently sniff their butts like the dogs we have become and move on i guess... i can't do that. what am i supposed to call that? what flavour? i have people in my own life who think the world is so fucked up that they have been born the wrong sex. one has become gay after his wife died, another is wanting a sex change, because he doesn't like men. women who prefer the company of women to the exclusion of men. that says that we as a human race are confused about our basic sexuality. we think we can outshop everything even who we are when we were born and "fix" everything to our own liking. a one perspective world. we need open dialogue, we need to figure these things out. not just be afraid of them.
the big one for me is that we think we have a soul, because we are conscious, when in reality we mindlessly breed like rats. here i am speaking of comments against the western world by moslem youth, who are as pissed off as we are to the point of jihad. they'r going to out number us with more than one wife and multiple kids. they actually said that on video. maybe it was prescripted by isis brainwash like some black op to piss off the west. btw, wikileaks also has evidence of clintons association with the saudi's the destruction of lybia, and the setting up of isis. so you tell me, what should i call someone of dubious sexuality? gay, bi, moslem, christian, missionary, doggy style, cross dresser, sex change, which way? man to woman, woman to man? the feminists wanted equality, but we have a dog's breakfast, literally. why can't sexuality just be personal and private? why is it used as a tool against someone, eg. u.s. presidency, both sides are guilty. misogyny yes, that is the two edge sword of anger. anger is fear. fear is truth, that we aren't willing to face or in denial of. it is not just about a cute girl t-shirt or a ripped first lady. it is about what is human and who cares anymore? on the ground level we can't even run our own families. in the media we are being destroyed. what's the big deal about the word tranny? it's like saying i'm hetero. so what? call me hetero. i've been called worse. misogynist, as you say, or gay. but guess what, i'm none of that. i just have a big mouth and worn out filter...
sorry, i just seem to think out loud. it's me, not you. my friend S just had a similar rant from this u.s. election turn over. the tiger is out of the cage, where do we go from here?
I'm not asking you not to wonder out loud on the Internet about the First Lady's genitalia. I'm just letting you know that a particular word you used is considered a slur—a word used to cut people down and make them feel less-than—and that it would be thoughtful of you to avoid using it in the future, regardless of who you're talking about.
If you're wondering what words to use to describe someone who's had gender correction surgery, it's generally given as "transwoman" or "transman." If you're wondering what words to use to describe someone who happens to be attracted to a transwoman or transman, there isn't currently a specific appellation for that. If a straight man is attracted to a transwoman, he's still straight; if a lesbian is attracted to a transwoman, she's still a lesbian.
ok, i get it. it is the slang of something specific. i do not know those terms specifically, transman and transwoman, and now transhuman...
trannie - a contemptuous or slang term used to defer to a transvestite, a transsexual, or a transgender person.
so this leads me to ask what would be an appropriate term for someone homophobic be as gender specific, i.e. of men and or women?
i am coming from the handicap of what is called old school ))) in those days people used the word fag for anything they didn't understand, which was weird because it also means cigarette..gay also meant to be happy, i think people who are onlookers get confused by all this.. i've only recently begun understanding lgbt properly, and now there is lgbdt (disadvantaged). i think a universal term to use as condescending would be, "you stupid fuck". like in american sub culture.. ugh!
these labels are applied like medical terms as if to control or correct. and i guess being derogatory is a similar act of superiority over someone different. it seems to have become a science. as if personal preference is something wrong and has to be labeled for control and treatment.
and what on earth is post-truth?
duh
Post-truth politics (also called post-factual politics) is a political culture in which debate is framed largely by appeals to emotion disconnected from the details of policy, and by the repeated assertion of talking points to which factual rebuttals are ignored.
so this leads me to ask what would be an appropriate term for someone homophobic be as gender specific, i.e. of men and or women?
I'm not sure what you're asking here. Do you mean someone only homophobic about gay men, but not lesbians (or vice versa)? As far as I know, there isn't one.
and now transhuman...
hahah, transhumanism is a different kettle of fish entirely!
there is perpetual new science serving elitists dividing and multiplying our human genetics that creates new need for new drugs to create new schizoid separation within ourselves... for purposes of social control. (kirkegard) the truth is that physical appearances apart, we are all both, balances of yin and yang, male and female. so labeling limits us from being our whole selves including our connectedness to others, regardless of what we are being labeled for social identification.. i think its a hybrid breeding program by some arrogant humans to feel superior and prop up superhuman elitists who lord it over the masses at the expense of our natural existence. to me that is just our paranoid ego supremacist reptilian brain wanting to control everything. our human minds fear that we don't exist. so we constantly have to try prove that we do perceive we exist and that we are somehow special, by which we justify conquer and command power structures. science is really a lost cause. it may be that the machine and the matrix are now artificially intelligent organisms using us for their gain. there is nothing in science that does not already exist in nature. my sarcasm is pointed at those who somehow think themselves specious.
so yes, the flavours of something such as a homophobic womanizer like donald trump, or a white supremacist chauvinist misogynist like the pope, or a feminist sociopathic criminal like hillary clinton. these are stereotypes to which we are expected to aspire to or at least facilitate?
this is the dragon of humanism we have created. we are crazy.
truly, we are all specious, or none - billy childish
no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 07:17 pm (UTC)That said, I gladly voted for Clinton and if anyone wants to drag me for it idgaf.
no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 07:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 07:29 pm (UTC)On a more obscure note, I really want to see John Fetterman go places.
no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 09:37 am (UTC)I need hope right now. :(
no subject
Date: 2016-11-16 08:41 pm (UTC)It's pretty much impossible to overestimate the Importance of the Penis.
no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 01:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 09:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 11:30 am (UTC)But yeah, misogyny was definitely a factor here, so I do wonder if I'm going to see it in MY lifetime (I'm 40)
no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 09:35 pm (UTC)yeah in retrospect I don't know how I failed so badly at reading. words have been hard for the best 48ish hours =/
no subject
Date: 2016-11-11 04:46 pm (UTC)https://youtu.be/2ayHf7qbZGA
btw, google ceo is guilty of election fraud in redirecting content for hillary against trump. that doesn't mean to say the republicans are not evil (i mean guilty) as well.. as they helped to invent the game of polarization of nation to destabilize and control governments for profit from taxation.
all i can say as a sovereign citizen and taxpayer is i want my money back. nothing personal.
no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 03:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 08:27 pm (UTC)I think a woman president would be great!
no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-09 11:40 pm (UTC)*HUGS*
no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 04:03 am (UTC)I love Michelle Obama, but I think the double handicap of being female and a person of color would be too much to overcome in the next, say, 50 years. We've seen the obstruction her husband has faced because of his skin color. I'd vote for her in a heartbeat, though!
no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 04:11 am (UTC)I didn't think we would ever have a Black president, but we did. I doubt it will happen again for many years, but we did.
I really don't think Michelle will run. Maybe I should say I hope she doesn't. I love Michelle, but enough of the family ties. The same with Chelsea. If they are smart, they will stay away from the White House.
Hugs, Jon
no subject
Date: 2016-11-13 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-14 04:56 am (UTC)My guess is we are back to old white men again for awhile. :(
no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 09:20 am (UTC)bill is a bitter old prick, i think he's the reason she lost
; ))
no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 04:26 pm (UTC)sky
Date: 2016-11-10 11:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 09:34 pm (UTC)Excuse me?
the truth is out there..
Date: 2016-11-10 10:54 pm (UTC)you need to go to the locker room...
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/alex-jones-michelle-obama-is-a-man-who-murdered-joan-rivers-to-cover-it-up/
i love alex, since he is not afraid to wear his heart on his sleeve unlike the illuminati who consistently murder to cover up their tracks)))
Quote: “I really think — her daughters don’t look like her — I really think this is some weird hoax they did again,” he said, “just like he didn’t get sworn in on the Bible, it was the Quran. All this weirdness, I mean, I used to laugh at this stuff, but man, it’s all about rubbing our noses in it. I think it’s all an arranged marriage, it’s all completely fake and it’s this big sick joke because he’s obsessed with transgender, just like some weird cult or something. I think Michelle Obama is a man. I really do. I really do. I believe it.” - AJ
; )
RE: the truth is out there..
Date: 2016-11-11 06:35 am (UTC)RE: the truth is out there..
Date: 2016-11-11 09:46 am (UTC)RE: the truth is out there..
Date: 2016-11-11 11:58 am (UTC)RE: the truth is out there..
Date: 2016-11-11 05:10 pm (UTC)i'm just saying to myself, i told you so, and i did see all this ten years ago. it just took a while for it to come into mainstream media and we have wikileaks and anonymous to thank for that. for instance, what do you make of this?
https://youtu.be/2ayHf7qbZGA
so i just call a spade a spade and if someone has had a sex change we just silently sniff their butts like the dogs we have become and move on i guess... i can't do that. what am i supposed to call that? what flavour? i have people in my own life who think the world is so fucked up that they have been born the wrong sex. one has become gay after his wife died, another is wanting a sex change, because he doesn't like men. women who prefer the company of women to the exclusion of men. that says that we as a human race are confused about our basic sexuality. we think we can outshop everything even who we are when we were born and "fix" everything to our own liking. a one perspective world. we need open dialogue, we need to figure these things out. not just be afraid of them.
the big one for me is that we think we have a soul, because we are conscious, when in reality we mindlessly breed like rats. here i am speaking of comments against the western world by moslem youth, who are as pissed off as we are to the point of jihad. they'r going to out number us with more than one wife and multiple kids. they actually said that on video. maybe it was prescripted by isis brainwash like some black op to piss off the west. btw, wikileaks also has evidence of clintons association with the saudi's the destruction of lybia, and the setting up of isis. so you tell me, what should i call someone of dubious sexuality? gay, bi, moslem, christian, missionary, doggy style, cross dresser, sex change, which way? man to woman, woman to man? the feminists wanted equality, but we have a dog's breakfast, literally. why can't sexuality just be personal and private? why is it used as a tool against someone, eg. u.s. presidency, both sides are guilty. misogyny yes, that is the two edge sword of anger. anger is fear. fear is truth, that we aren't willing to face or in denial of. it is not just about a cute girl t-shirt or a ripped first lady. it is about what is human and who cares anymore? on the ground level we can't even run our own families. in the media we are being destroyed. what's the big deal about the word tranny? it's like saying i'm hetero. so what? call me hetero. i've been called worse. misogynist, as you say, or gay. but guess what, i'm none of that. i just have a big mouth and worn out filter...
sorry, i just seem to think out loud. it's me, not you. my friend S just had a similar rant from this u.s. election turn over. the tiger is out of the cage, where do we go from here?
RE: the truth is out there..
Date: 2016-11-11 08:13 pm (UTC)If you're wondering what words to use to describe someone who's had gender correction surgery, it's generally given as "transwoman" or "transman." If you're wondering what words to use to describe someone who happens to be attracted to a transwoman or transman, there isn't currently a specific appellation for that. If a straight man is attracted to a transwoman, he's still straight; if a lesbian is attracted to a transwoman, she's still a lesbian.
RE: the truth is out there..
Date: 2016-11-12 01:09 am (UTC)ok, i get it. it is the slang of something specific. i do not know those terms specifically, transman and transwoman, and now transhuman...
trannie - a contemptuous or slang term used to defer to a transvestite, a transsexual, or a transgender person.
so this leads me to ask what would be an appropriate term for someone homophobic be as gender specific, i.e. of men and or women?
i am coming from the handicap of what is called old school ))) in those days people used the word fag for anything they didn't understand, which was weird because it also means cigarette..gay also meant to be happy, i think people who are onlookers get confused by all this.. i've only recently begun understanding lgbt properly, and now there is lgbdt (disadvantaged). i think a universal term to use as condescending would be, "you stupid fuck". like in american sub culture.. ugh!
these labels are applied like medical terms as if to control or correct. and i guess being derogatory is a similar act of superiority over someone different. it seems to have become a science. as if personal preference is something wrong and has to be labeled for control and treatment.
and what on earth is post-truth?
duh
Post-truth politics (also called post-factual politics) is a political culture in which debate is framed largely by appeals to emotion disconnected from the details of policy, and by the repeated assertion of talking points to which factual rebuttals are ignored.
it just gets weirder and weirder all the time...
RE: the truth is out there..
Date: 2016-11-12 07:59 am (UTC)I'm not sure what you're asking here. Do you mean someone only homophobic about gay men, but not lesbians (or vice versa)? As far as I know, there isn't one.
and now transhuman...
hahah, transhumanism is a different kettle of fish entirely!
RE: the truth is out there..
Date: 2016-11-13 10:45 pm (UTC)so yes, the flavours of something such as a homophobic womanizer like donald trump, or a white supremacist chauvinist misogynist like the pope, or a feminist sociopathic criminal like hillary clinton. these are stereotypes to which we are expected to aspire to or at least facilitate?
this is the dragon of humanism we have created. we are crazy.
truly, we are all specious, or none - billy childish
no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 10:48 am (UTC)Hopes are dimming for a female president in the near future over there.
I feel for America right now.
no subject
Date: 2016-11-10 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-11-11 11:31 am (UTC)